I know you can run a combiner on Trango, Dragonwave, and Exalt for
sure. I'm certain you can run one on most of the others too, with some
restrictions. It's a nice option because it gives you some redundancy
along with doubling the throughput.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 1/16/2015 2:17 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Can one put on a combiner and a different brand radio as to have moar
> throughput?
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"TJ Trout" <***@voltbb.com>
> *To: ****@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Friday, January 16, 2015 4:09:46 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ?
>
> Mike;
>
> Integra not available in 6 or 11, when they are it's only 100 meg jump
> in performance from the lumina...
>
> I'll checkout trango and maybe alcoma. Sounds like the IP20c is where
> it's at but I'm assuming they are 40K?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:01 PM, TJ Trout <***@voltbb.com
> <mailto:***@voltbb.com>> wrote:
>
> What's the HP high power? What's the cost on that bad boy?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jon Langeler
> <jon-***@michwave.net <mailto:jon-***@michwave.net>> wrote:
>
> IP20C HP. Get a new FCC license :) You'll have another
> polarity to use later or in another direction.
>
> Jon
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 4:48 PM, TJ Trout <***@voltbb.com
> <mailto:***@voltbb.com>> wrote:
>
> What is my least expensive option for getting more
> bandwidth in 6ghz or 11ghz ? Right now I have 366mbps
> (56mhz 256qam) would like double or better?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jon Langeler
> <jon-***@michwave.net
> <mailto:jon-***@michwave.net>> wrote:
>
> compression yields a lot at 64byte packet, but yields
> much less at 256byte and larger...it's a curve.
>
> Also if your upgrading a long 5GHz link with 6Ghz,
> you'll probably be slightly better off even if the
> calcs say 'low uptime'. 11GHz will 'swing' during
> rains more than 6GHz obviously so the higher gain from
> the same size dishes helps there. Licensing a wide
> single polarity is always cheapest...
>
> -Jon
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman
> <***@imaginenetworksllc.com
> <mailto:***@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
>
> That sounds backwards. Why would smaller packets
> net you greater throughput?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeremy
> <***@gmail.com
> <mailto:***@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It's really 60. Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps
> full duplex (if every packet was a VoIP
> packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic
> real-world TCP throughput that you can expect.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim
> <***@comsearch.com
> <mailto:***@comsearch.com>> wrote:
>
> Itâs really 60!
>
> *60 MHz *
>
> *CH*
>
>
>
> *N(*
>
>
>
> *G(*
>
> 1
>
>
>
> 5960.0250
>
>
>
> 6212.0650
>
> 2
>
>
>
> 6019.3250
>
>
>
> 6271.3650
>
> 3
>
>
>
> 6078.6250
>
>
>
> 6330.6650
>
> 4
>
>
>
> 6137.9250
>
>
>
> 6389.9650
>
> As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all
> depends on the environment. If x-pol is
> needed to clear a channel, it isnât going
> to be available on the orthogonal
> polarization.
>
> *From:*Af [mailto:af-***@afmug.com
> <mailto:af-***@afmug.com>] *On Behalf
> Of *Ken Hohhof
> *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM
>
>
> *To:* ***@afmug.com <mailto:***@afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
> option for higher capacity ?
>
> In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30
> contiguous?
>
> Iâm thinking it might be easier to do XPIC
> on the same 30 MHz channel than to find 60
> MHz of available spectrum, but I havenât
> done anything in 6 GHz, mainly because of
> antenna size. Yes the FCC did relax the
> antenna rules to allow down to a 3 ft
> dish, but realistically that wonât give
> you enough gain unless itâs a short link,
> especially given that 6 GHz is subject to
> multipath fades. So bottom line I havenât
> kept up with what you can do in 6 GHz, so
> I could easily be wrong or behind the times.
>
> *From:*Mike Hammett <mailto:***@ics-il.net>
>
> *Sent:*Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM
>
> *To:****@afmug.com <mailto:***@afmug.com>
>
> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
> option for higher capacity ?
>
> 30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6
> GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 GHz... IIRC.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <***@kwisp.com
> <mailto:***@kwisp.com>>
> *To: ****@afmug.com <mailto:***@afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
> option for higher capacity ?
>
> I would first talk to your frequency
> coordinator about what FCC channel widths
> can be licensed in what bands. Iâm not
> sure 40 MHz channels exist in 6 GHz, and I
> believe youâll find an 80 MHz channel
> width means you need to license 2 adjacent
> channels. There is no benefit to having a
> radio that does 80 MHz channels if thatâs
> not what you license, other than maybe
> having consistent equipment across your
> network to simplify sparing.
>
> *From:*TJ Trout <mailto:***@voltbb.com>
>
> *Sent:*Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM
>
> *To:****@afmug.com <mailto:***@afmug.com>
>
> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
> option for higher capacity ?
>
> 11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it
> does in april it's just 60mhz! Should I
> even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems
> like 80 is the way to go?
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino
> Villarini <***@aeronetpr.com
> <mailto:***@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:
>
> 11 ghz integra
>
> Gino A. Villarini
>
> President
>
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>
> www.aeronetpr.com <http://www.aeronetpr.com>
>
> @aeronetpr
>
> *From: *TJ Trout <***@voltbb.com
> <mailto:***@voltbb.com>>
> *Reply-To: *"***@afmug.com
> <mailto:***@afmug.com>" <***@afmug.com
> <mailto:***@afmug.com>>
> *Date: *Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM
> *To: *"***@afmug.com <mailto:***@afmug.com>"
> <***@afmug.com <mailto:***@afmug.com>>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best
> option for higher capacity ?
>
> I guess what I'm interested in is what is
> the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz radio in
> terms of bits/hz or should I just use the
> lumina in 2+0?
>
> On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout"
> <***@voltbb.com <mailto:***@voltbb.com>> wrote:
>
> So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I
> need to upgrade, what is the most
> economical option for more capacity ? Saf
> doesn't really have much besides 2+0 right
> now (maybe that's my best option?) So I
> was thinking about trying another brand
> something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What
> are my options that won't cost an arm and
> a leg ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>